The Truth Behind Truvia
By now, you’ve probably seen the ads for Truvia, the new FDA-approved stevia-based sweetener. That’s right—I used the terms “FDA-approved” and “stevia” in the same sentence. And, on the surface, it seems like a major victory for natural supplements. But there’s much more to the stevia story—and it’s not all as rosy as the media is making it out to be.
It’s true that Truvia is natural. And since it’s natural, it’s far less likely to cause problems than completely unnatural chemical sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose. However, even though it’s natural, Truvia is actually an incomplete version of stevia, using only a fraction of the whole herb.
But what bothers me most about it is the hypocrisy involved in its sudden “approval.”
From book burning to “generally accepted as safe” in a single decade
For years, the FDA has been vehemently opposed to stevia. In fact, in 1998, James R. Lahar, FDA Compliance Officer in the Dallas (Texas) District, sent a letter to Oscar Rodes, President of Stevita, Inc., a supplier of stevia products and books and publications about the herb.
In that letter Mr. Lahar wrote: “….a current inventory must be taken by an investigator of this office, who will also be available to witness destruction of the cookbooks, literature, and other publications for the purpose of verifying compliance.” [emphasis added]
No, I’m not kidding—I have a copy of the letter! In complete violation of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of these United States, an FDA official was threatening to burn books! The last time that happened was in 1956, when the publications of Dr. Wilhelm Reich were burned, once again in an action instigated by FDA. And of course book burning was common in National Socialist (Nazi) Germany, and throughout Europe during the “Inquisition”—but these United States are (we’re told) a “free country.”
And that letter was written only 10 years ago! So what happened in the last decade to transform stevia from such a dangereous substance that publications concerning it were to be destroyed into a perfectly safe food additive?
Here are a few quotes that may give you a hint:
* “I never have and never will approve a new drug to an individual, but only to a large pharmaceutical firm with unlimited finances.”
—Dr Richard Crout, Director, Bureau of Drugs, FDA (quoted in the Spotlight for January 18, 1982)
* Senator Long: “Did you notice a tendency [by FDA] to spend a great deal of time going after the little manufacturer rather than some of the large ones?”
Witness: “I have definitely noticed that…when a small company is purchased by a large company, the…attacks stop.”
Senator Long: “The merchandise becomes alright, then?”
Witness: “Becomes sacrosanct.”
—1966 U.S. Senate Subcommittee Hearings, as reported in The Dictocrats, by Omar Garrison, ARC Books, New York City, 1970, p. 64
And here are three more clues: Coca Cola, PepsiCo, and Cargill.
For those of you who may not have heard of it before, Cargill is a multi-billion dollar agribusiness similar in size (and power) to the other mega-corporations listed.
On December 17th, 2008 Cargill announced that the FDA notified them that it had “no objection” to Truvia (which is also used by CocaCola). In fact, the agency even granted it the coveted “generally recognized as safe” (or GRAS) status. The FDA also informed PepsiCo that it had “no objection” to its natural (but also incomplete) stevia product, called “PureVia™”.
So now that the giant corporations have taken an interest in it, stevia fractions are magically OK (although some people are wondering if the “whole” stevia used by smaller companies may still be subject to attack by los Federales).
How you can help change history
This so-called victory—and the long history behind it—is further proof that FDA reform is long overdue. And it’s not just the decades-long history of “cuddling up” to giant corporations, but also FDA’s self-admitted incompetence. Among many other things, the FDA’s own report admitted that the agency “cannot even keep up with the advances in science”! (For further details, refer to the full-text version of the report, titled FDA Science and Mission at Risk).
Don’t let the FDA play games with other natural alternatives the way it has with stevia. Please visit www.reformFDA.org to read much more about the reform effort being led by some of the key organizations in natural health, including the American Association for Health Freedom and the Life Extension Foundation. And please consider signing the petition! Your own health—and the health of all Americans is at stake.
About the author

Jonathan V. Wright, M.D. has degrees from both Harvard University (cum laude) and the University of Michigan. More than any other doctor, he practically invented the modern science of applied nutritional biochemistry and he has advanced nutritional medicine for nearly three decades.
As of today, Dr. Wright has received over 35,000 patient visits at his now-famous Tahoma Clinic in Washington State.
To learn more about Dr. Wright, and to sign up for his free Health e-Tips eLetter, please visit www.wrightnewsletter.com.

Comments
Tom
I am a 70 year old retired Army officer in excellent health but my 88 year old mother has been diagnosed with age related macular degeneration (otherwise in excellent health). Our local "eye doctors" have basically told us, "sorry, it's an age thing". For the first time in my life, I'm beginning to think medicine here in Appalachia may be stuck in the horse and buggy days and a bottle of generic OTC "snake oil" is the only prescription known to exist.
Is there any clinically tested viable treatments, slowing of progression, or a cure for ARMD available in today's medical technologies?
Anonymous
Re. comment from Tom dated Wed 06/17/2009, visit website benfotiamine.com. There are some interesting stories.
Ben
I love these kinds of insightful articles and blog posts. Thank you, Dr. Wright, for daring to talk about the inconsistencies in FDA regulation. I talk about this every now and again on The Swanson Vitamins Blog - http://swansonvitamins.blogs.com - and people really seem to get fired up about it. It is still hard for me to believe that it all comes down to money...but I really don't know.
Anthony Nelson
Check out this video on Stevia: http://www.healthiertalk.com/s...
Edwin
To Tom --
Re your Mom's diagnosis of macular degeneration.
Chelation therapy has been described as helpful for macular degeneration. It is helpful for other things to.
I don't remember the name, but there is a national organization that lists doctors in every locality who do chelation therapy.
Anonymous
I just found your web page from Hylands web page. It's very dishearting reading what I did on your web page. We won against the same thing over 15 years ago. Let's hope we can win again. I am going to make my friends aware of your web page. Thank you for your hard work. We are retired on a fixed income, we will try to join your web page in Sept. SharonB
Patrick N.
I just read your article about Stevia. I've been following the Stevia story for quite a few years now. In your article you said Truvia is actually an incomplete version of stevia, using only a fraction of the whole herb. I'm diabetic and a lover of sweets. This article is VERY interesting to me. I have two questions. The first one is what brand of Stevia would you recommend? The second question: Is there ant form of brown sugar made with Stevia?
Thank you
Anonymous
Thanks Dr. Wright. You keep us well informed. Sorry that your clinic is not here in California. We need more physicians like you and who will take a stand, plus the public needs to step up to the plate for men and women like you.
When it comes to STEVIA I want the real thing now things with additives from the Big Companies.
Am also a label reader.
Remember Knowledge is power.
Anonymous
The "prohibition" on stevia by the FDA comes/came from the very top of the former Bush Administration (the VP & Former Sec. of Defense) who both have/had substantial investments and personal interests in the artificial sweetener industry for over the last three-four decades. Stevia beats their unnatural chemical sweeteners such as aspartame and sucralose (not to mention the even other crappy stuff that was on the market before these) hands down. Another "problem" with stevia is that big pharma can't create a patent for something that nature has created, so we end up with the like's of "truvia" where a chemically "branded" & "processed" sugar substitute, made up from a stevia extract, and erythritol, a natural sugar alcohol, has been placed on the shelves of our super markets. As knowledgeable consumers, we should demand and see the presence of more stevia in the products that we can buy. At the same time we should refuse to patronize products from the likes of Cargill, Coke and Pepsico who are some of the global multinationals directly responsible for the present wave of unhealthy overweight people on our planet. By sending a message back with your pocket books, and not buying their unhealthy products, maybe the lobbyists in DC who are paid by big pharma, the unscrupulous doctors that are on the 'payola' lists, the multinationals and some of the "special interest" members who make up the board of the FDA may start to see the light. For more than a decade now Japan has allowed stevia to be used in its soft drink industry.This makes me wonder and ask questions about a "conspiracy" having to do with the heavy handed way decisions by the FDA have been made concerning stevia.
Post new comment